AUSTIN, Texas -- There was Donald Rumsfeld on Sunday morning
repeatedly warning the Iraqis that prisoners of war are protected by the
Geneva Convention and showing pictures of POWs is wrong. That would be the
same Donald Rumsfeld who refused to classify the POWs at Gitmo in Cuba as
POWs, instead calling them "detainees" and "military combatants."
The administration initially prepared to claim Al Qaeda fighters
were not covered by the Geneva Convention, until the military pointed out
that what goes around, comes around. We displayed pictures of our prisoners
wearing black hoods, in chains and housed in outdoor, chain-link kennels.
If the Republican Guard surrenders, will right-wing radio talk
jocks who have never been near a war refer to them as "hummus-eating
surrender monkeys"?
Meanwhile, back at the ranch ... You need to keep an eye on the
back pages of the newspapers and the brief recaps that follow, "And in other
news today ..." There is stuff flying under the radar you would not believe.
For one thing, both the House and the Senate have passed George
W. Bush's budget, including the second round of tax cuts -- $726 billion, 50
percent of it going to the richest 1 percent of the people in this country.
In the Senate, Democrats managed to repeal $100 billion of the tax cut in
order to pay for the current war, but Sen. Bill Frist, Republican majority
leader, says he plans to go back and take even that out of the bill. Had it
not been for war, this budget would have been the subject of a huge national
debate.
This enormous tax cut will provide a break of $256 a year to the
average working family. Almost half of all taxpayers will get less than
$100. But someone making a million dollars a year will cut a cut of $92,000.
This is iniquitous. It is wicked. It is damnably unfair.
This budget does three stupid and mean things simultaneously: It
cuts taxes for the richest Americans during a national crisis, cuts domestic
spending that people's lives depend on, and completely ignores the cost of
both war and reconstruction. Under this budget, almost all discretionary
domestic programs, as well as Medicare and Medicaid, are subject to cuts or
restraints.
"Discretionary spending" is such a cold, meaningless term. There
is so much pain behind it, you can hardly begin to imagine. Student loans,
childcare, food stamps, school lunches, job training, veterans programs, and
cash assistance for the elderly and disabled poor are all being cut. That
means people's lives will be cut up. Mothers who have struggled to get off
welfare, barely making it on minimum-wage jobs, will lose childcare and be
pushed back onto the rolls -- with their eligibility to run out soon. Young
people trying to acquire job skills will be pushed back onto the street.
This plan is supposed to stimulate jobs and growth. It doesn't.
Analysis by the Economic Policy Institute shows paltry job growth this year,
and the plan would actually increase job losses in the long run. Even by
White House estimates, the plan would produce only 190,000 jobs this year
for the more than 8 million people seeking work. Since March 2001, the
economy has lost 2.5 million jobs.
The House "stimulus" bill offers $114 billion in corporate tax
concessions, mostly in the form of 30 percent in extra "depreciation"
write-offs in each of he next three years. According to Citizens for Tax
Justice, the changes will wipe out more than a fifth of otherwise expected
corporate income tax payments over the next three years. The bill provides
$8 in corporate tax cuts for every dollar allocated to help unemployed
workers.
Also under cover of war, the House passed a bankruptcy law that
makes it harder for individual debtors to file for bankruptcy and easier for
corporations to do so. The bill is full of ugly little details, including
the House rejection of an amendment to give families owed child support a
stronger claim on the assets of a delinquent former spouse than, say, Visa
or MasterCard. Nope, corporations first, children last. It's compassionate
conservatism.
In a vote that will come to haunt us all, the Senate killed a
Democratic effort to remove tax cuts worth $1.2 trillion over 10 years and
allocate the savings to Social Security.
Now here's a nifty little item: Deputy Defense Secretary Paul
Wolfowitz, on the first day of the war, ordered the service chiefs to
provide examples in which President Bush could cite national security to
exempt the military from environmental laws. The administration has already
asked Congress to ease laws governing endangered species, marine mammals,
and air and water quality in the name of military training. According to The
Washington Post, Wolfowitz suggested the Pentagon reverse its "past
constraint" against having the president invoke the national security
exemptions written into some environmental laws. Interesting: National
security includes more pollution?
Meanwhile, the Israel defense minister has announced he wants to
push a security fence deeper into the West Bank, bringing another 40,000
Jewish settlers and around 3,000 Palestinians to the Israeli side. Can you
say, "Land grab?"
To find out more about Molly Ivins and read features by other
Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web
page at
www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2003 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
