The Columbus Institute of Contemporary Journalism (CICJ) has operated Freepress.org since 2000 and ColumbusFreepress.com was started initially as a separate project to highlight the print newspaper and local content.
ColumbusFreepress.com has been operating as a project of the CICJ for many years and so the sites are now being merged so all content on ColumbusFreepress.com now lives on Freepress.org
The Columbus Freepress is a non-profit funded by donations we need your support to help keep local journalism that isn't afraid to speak truth to power alive.
Labor Day may be a fitting tribute to America's workers. But what
about the other 364 days of the year? Despite all the talk about the
importance and dignity of working people, they get little power or
glory in the everyday world of news media.
What if the situation were reversed?
Once a year, big investors and corporate owners could be honored
on Business Day. To celebrate the holiday, politicians might march arm
in arm through downtown Manhattan with the likes of Bill Gates, Warren
Buffett and Donald Trump. Executives could have the day off while
media outlets said some nice things about them.
During the rest of the year, in this inverted scenario,
journalists would focus on the real lives of the nation's workforce.
Instead of making heroes out of billionaire investors -- and instead
of reporting on Wall Street as the ultimate center of people's
economic lives -- the news media would provide extensive coverage of
the workplace.
For instance, such coverage would reflect the health hazards that
workers face. On an average day, 18 Americans die from on-the-job
injuries while an estimated 165 people die from occupational diseases.
Other daily work-related figures include 36,400 injuries and 3,200
illnesses.
If media outlets can keep us so closely informed about stock
prices every day, they could also keep us posted on exactly which
industrial workplaces are killing and injuring America's workers. Much
of the toll is less than obvious: Researchers have found that for each
American killed by a workplace injury, nearly 10 job-related deaths
occur due to disease.
If these grim events were reported on a daily basis, with the
intensity and attention to detail now reserved for coverage of the
stock market, then our society would be much more aware of working
conditions across the country -- and there would be more public
pressure for improvement.
In a more labor-friendly media environment, televised punditry
wouldn't be dominated by pro-corporate forums like "The Capital Gang,"
"Hardball," "The McLaughlin Group" and ABC's "This Week" -- which, not
coincidentally, are made possible by union-bashing firms like Archer
Daniels Midland and General Electric. In contrast, prominent TV
programs would present the outlooks of people who don't ride in
limousines.
Public television -- now featuring the "Nightly Business Report"
show -- would also be willing to air a regular program that might be
called "Nightly Labor Report." In this media dream world, National
Public Radio would not continue to include a "business update" as part
of hourly news broadcasts without also providing a "labor update" at
the top of each hour.
The biggest-circulation dailies would not be limited to
corporate-owned newspapers along the lines of USA Today, the Wall
Street Journal and the New York Times. Instead, at least one of the
most widely distributed papers would be owned and operated by a
coalition of labor unions. And the editorial pages would routinely
publish a real diversity of views.
On the magazine racks, periodicals like Business Week and Forbes
(motto: "Capitalist Tool") would have to compete with equally
bankrolled publications such as Labor Week and Solidarity Forever
(motto: "Worker's Tool").
Congress would not get away with changing the name of Washington
National Airport to Ronald Reagan National Airport, as occurred in
1998. A pro-labor media atmosphere would make it politically untenable
to name the airport after a former president who smashed the air
traffic controllers' union early in his first term.
Not content to gush out a steady stream of platitudes about
"democracy" and the "free market," the news media would probe the
concept of workplace democracy.
Right now, the mass media rarely explore the idea of extending
democratic principles to the institutions where Americans work for a
living. It's as though we've been conditioned to believe that our most
exalted political values -- free speech and the right to vote for the
leaders of powerful institutions -- should not intrude past the
workplace door.
A few decades ago, satirist Tom Lehrer recorded a song about
National Brotherhood Week. "It's only for a week, so have no fear," he
chortled. "Be grateful that it doesn't last all year!"