The Columbus Institute of Contemporary Journalism (CICJ) has operated Freepress.org since 2000 and ColumbusFreepress.com was started initially as a separate project to highlight the print newspaper and local content.
ColumbusFreepress.com has been operating as a project of the CICJ for many years and so the sites are now being merged so all content on ColumbusFreepress.com now lives on Freepress.org
The Columbus Freepress is a non-profit funded by donations we need your support to help keep local journalism that isn't afraid to speak truth to power alive.
Some resent the term "class warfare," but what a
great description for our headlong rush to war with
Iraq: Class Warfare. Ask yourself, "Who will benefit
and who will pay?"
While there is no evidence of a connection between
Iraq and Al-Qaida, there ARE many indications that
war with Iraq will energize Al-Qaida and other
terrorist groups. Why would anyone want that?
Plans were prepared for a war with Iraq BEFORE the
attack of September 11. How could those plans result
from an act of terrorism which had not yet occurred
and which, by its own statement, the administration
could not have anticipated?
If America's goal is to protect Iraq's neighbors, why
are all its neighbors except Israel against the war?
If our goal is to protect the larger world from a mad
man, why has the rest of the world been so loath to
support us?
Should young American men and women - most of whom
are NOT from the privileged class - suffer or die in a
war which will not reduce domestic terrorism, which
will alienate the Arab world, which is at best only
nominally supported by our allies, which will kill and
maim innocent Iraqi civilians, and the cost of which
will be paid by the middle and working classes.
The administration is pushing "permanent" and
additional tax cuts for the rich but seem
unconcerned about the tremendous potential cost of the
war (over $1 trillion). Who do you think they plan to
have pay for it through additional taxes, cuts in
programs, and inflation?
And doesn't it seem strange that no matter what
happens to indicate the possibility of a peaceful
settlement, the administration flatly denigrates it
and moves on to a NEW objection - and the TV talking
heads say, "Yep, war is inevitable"?
Obviously, the war is central to establishing a "new
world order" with the "indispensable nation," the
"one remaining superpower" reigning supreme. Rushing
into the vacuum caused by the collapse of the Soviet
empire, we intend to enlarge our own empire: expand
power, expand influence, expand control, increase
return for mega-corporations and the mega-rich.
The recently released "Bush Doctrine" says as
much; we will let NO ONE approach our level of power
and influence and will use force - even "preemptive"
force and nuclear weapons - to ensure our global
predominance. Iraq is a handy vehicle toward
establishing that doctrine; that is why a war was
planned even before the September 11 attack.
Along with oil as an incentive for war
(greater US control of vast resources and, thus,
better competitive leverage against Saudi Arabia,
Russia, and the European Union), Iraq is to serve as
an example of what will happen to anyone foolish
enough to resist the new US hegemony. That is why we
must have this war even if it increases terrorism
here, no matter the economic costs, no matter the
deaths and suffering among our armed forces and among
the Iraqi people, no matter how transparent our
justification for war may turn out to be, no matter
WHAT!
Apparently, the TV talking heads know this,
even if they are afraid to honestly explain why they
believe it. They repeat the discredited excuses,
announce the next accusation - which soon is itself
discredited - and AGAIN predict inevitable war,
possibly within months. The overwhelming impression
is of a random chronology of disconnected and
irrelevant presentations consecutively failing to
justify the coming major event that WILL be engaged,
REGARDLESS of justification.
The American people are not bullies; they are
not imperialists; and although they will pay any price
to defend themselves, they do NOT yearn for economic
sacrifice in the name of US global domination.
Neither do they wish to endanger their children
fighting for such a cause.
That is why the hard-line hawks are pushing as hard
as they can to find ANY excuse to justify their
disguised ends. Patriotism, fear of terrorism;
promises of cheap oil and democracy and justice for
women; tenuous connections here, possible future
behavior there, ANYTHING (other than the truth) that
will sell the war to the people.
We the people need to ask ourselves, "Why are we
being pushed toward war? Why is one justification
after another abandoned as without merit ? Why do we
hear that we should just take the president's word for
it without any evidence?" We should ask ourselves,
"Who will benefit from this war and who will pay for
it?"
I think the answers are clear and that if we are
brave enough to listen to ourselves, there will be no
war with Iraq.