The Columbus Institute of Contemporary Journalism (CICJ) has operated Freepress.org since 2000 and ColumbusFreepress.com was started initially as a separate project to highlight the print newspaper and local content.
ColumbusFreepress.com has been operating as a project of the CICJ for many years and so the sites are now being merged so all content on ColumbusFreepress.com now lives on Freepress.org
The Columbus Freepress is a non-profit funded by donations we need your support to help keep local journalism that isn't afraid to speak truth to power alive.
With the "New Economy" now in shambles, it's easy for media
outlets to disparage the illusions of the late 1990s -- years crammed with
high-tech mania, fat stock options and euphoria on Wall Street. But we hear
very little about the fact that much of the bubble was filled with hot
air from hyperventilating journalists.
Traveling back on a time machine, we would see mainstream
reporters and pundits routinely extolling the digitally enhanced nirvana of
huge profits and much more to come. The "New Economy" media juggernaut
was not to be denied.
Sure, journalists occasionally offered the common-sense
observation that the boom would go bust someday. But it was a minor note in
the media's orchestral tributes to the New Economy. And the bullish
pronouncements included an awful lot of hyped bull.
Five years ago, Business Week's July 28 edition was scorning
"economic dogma" for its failure to embrace the glorious future at hand.
"The fact is that major changes in the dynamics of growth are detonating many
conventional wisdoms," the magazine declared in an editorial that concluded: "It is the Dow, the S&P 500, and NASDAQ that are telling us old
assumptions should be challenged in the New Economy."
A column published on July 24, 1997, in the very conservative
Washington Times, by economist Lawrence Kudlow, rang the same bell: "Actually, information age high-tech breakthroughs have undreamed of spillovers that impact every nook and cranny of the new economy." Kudlow was upbeat about "even higher stock prices and even more economic growth as far as the eye can see."
In 1998, the July 20 issue of Time was one of many touting
the economic miracles of the Internet. "The real economy exists in
the thousands -- even tens of thousands -- of sites that together
with Yahoo are remaking the face of global commerce," Time reported. The
magazine could not contain its enthusiasm: "The real promise of all this
change is that it will enrich all of us, not just a bunch of kids in
Silicon Valley."
When the last July of the 20th century got underway,
Newsweek was featuring several pages about the national quest for riches: "The
bull market, powered by the cyberboom, is a pre-millennium party
that's blowing the roof off the American Dream. It's just that some of us can't
seem to find our invitations. And all this new wealth is creating a sense
of unease and bewilderment among those of us who don't know how to get in
touch with our inner moguls."
Meanwhile, insightful analysis of the "New Economy" received
scant mass-media exposure, but it certainly existed. While Newsweek was
fretting about "inner moguls," for instance, the progressive magazine
Dollars & Sense published an article by economist Dean Baker warning that
the country was in the midst of "a classic speculative bubble." A crash was
on the way, Baker pointed out, and it would financially clobber many working
people.
Writing three years ago, with the stock market near its
peak, Baker anticipated grim financial realities: "Many moderate-income
workers do have a direct stake in the market now that the vast majority of their pensions take the form of tax-sheltered retirement accounts such as a
401(k). These plans provide no guaranteed benefit to workers. At her
retirement, a worker gets exactly what she has managed to accumulate in these
accounts. Right now, a large percentage of the assets in these retirement
accounts is in stock funds."
Overall, Baker contended, "the post-crash world is not
likely to be a pretty one. The people who take the biggest losses will
undoubtedly be wealthy speculators who should have understood the risks. The
yuppie apostles of the 'new economy' will also be humbled by a plunging
stock market. But these people can afford large losses on their stock
holdings and still maintain a comfortable living standard."
Baker concluded his in-depth article by predicting a
foreseeable tragedy that major media outlets rarely dwelled on ahead of time:
"The real losers from a stock market crash will be the workers who lose
most of their pensions, and the workers who must struggle to find jobs in the
ensuing recession. Once again, those at the bottom will pay for the
foolishness of those at the top."
Now that the bubble has burst, most of the hot air about the
Don't know if you got this one or not.
"New Economy" has dissipated. This summer, the media atmosphere is
cool to scenarios for getting rich with shrewd investments. Too late.
_______________________________________________
Norman Solomon's latest book is "The Habits of Highly Deceptive=
Media." His
syndicated column focuses on media and politics.