The Columbus Institute of Contemporary Journalism (CICJ) has operated Freepress.org since 2000 and ColumbusFreepress.com was started initially as a separate project to highlight the print newspaper and local content.
ColumbusFreepress.com has been operating as a project of the CICJ for many years and so the sites are now being merged so all content on ColumbusFreepress.com now lives on Freepress.org
The Columbus Freepress is a non-profit funded by donations we need your support to help keep local journalism that isn't afraid to speak truth to power alive.
If we, the citizens of this nation, prevent the Bush Administration and
its apologists from placing their blood-stained hands upon our ears, turn
away from the voices of caution rising in chorus from the Establishment
and simply listen to the sounds of chaos emanating from Iraq, we will hear
the infamous, unmistakable echo of Vietnam attempting to tell us the
terrible truth: this war, too, is sound and fury signifying nothing.
Nothing but pointless and tragic death and destruction. Nothing but the
systematic dehumanization of our soldiers and of the people of Iraq.
Nothing but the absolute futility of a nation attempting to impose its
imperial power upon a people who refuse to accept it.
Those who still support the war deny they hear the echo. They insist that
this war is different than Vietnam. And in a sense, they are right; this
war is different in many respects--from its circumstances, to the nature
and intensity of its combat, to its lower casualty counts on both sides.
But the echo of Vietnam emanates not from the exact qualitative nature of
this war or the quantitative measures of its death and destruction; it
emanates from the essence of what this war is: unnecessary, unwinnable and
immoral.
As to the war being unnecessary, there can no longer be any debate among
honest people. Iraq posed no threat to the United States. After two
devastating wars with Iran and the US and a decade of US led economic
sanctions, it had become so militarily weak that it barely posed a threat
to its neighbors Israel and Turkey, let alone the richest, most powerful
nation in history, thousands of miles away. The feeble case for war
claiming otherwise rested upon two claims: Iraq possessed Weapons of Mass
Destruction and had a relationship with Al Queda. Ever since the drums of
war first began to beat, the anti-war movement has exposed the weakness
and, in many cases, fraudulence of the evidence behind these two claims.
Now the US government itself has put the two claims to rest, and thus
refuted the case for war--the Kay Report affirming that Iraq did not
possess WMDs and the 9/11 Commission affirming that no evidence suggests
Saddam's regime had a relationship with Al Queda.
As to the war being unwinnable, there can be no debate among people with a
basic understanding of the situation in Iraq and a willingness to accept
the truth and its implications. The essential nature of the situation is a
paradox pointing to a single solution: stable Iraqi society cannot emerge
until the security situation improves--but because US forces are the main
magnet of attacks and their presence the main instigator of violence, the
security situation will not improve until US forces withdraw. The
solution, then, is quite simple: US forces must withdraw as soon as possible.
Increasing US forces, escalating attacks on insurgents, or simply
maintaining the current strategy will not solve this paradox; in fact,
doing so will further inflame the situation because it will cause more
Iraqi civilians caught in the crossfire to sympathize with the insurgents.
The history of popular resistances to foreign occupations and presences
across the world--from the French in Algeria, to the US in Vietnam, to the
USSR in Afghanistan, to Israel in Palestine--confirms this.
As to the war being immoral, there can be no debate among people who
reject the institutionalized hypocrisy of the Establishment and apply the
same standards to the actions of their own nation (and its client states)
as they do to those nations or groups deemed "enemies." One of those
essential standards--which the Establishment always applies to its
enemies, but never to itself or its client states--is that the use of the
means of violence to achieve political ends (i.e. terrorism) is morally
unacceptable. The War on Iraq--waged not for self-defense, but to
establish the neo-conservative foreign policy of preventive war and to
ensure US hegemony over the Middle East and the world--clearly violates
this standard.
Supporters of the war will deny all of this. Their denial, however, should
surprise no one; history has proved that those unyielding in ideology can
remain deaf to any truth that contradicts it, no matter how loud that
truth becomes, and if they are at the helm of a nation, as they are today,
they will "stay the course" they have set, even when the truth is
screaming that certain disaster lies ahead.
In such a situation as we find ourselves, "staying the course" is neither
necessary nor noble; it is idiotic and suicidal--and because innocent
lives are implicated, it is downright murderous as well. As in Vietnam,
however, our leaders will continue to steer us towards disaster unless we
demand otherwise. And demand we can and must, because as citizens of what
is supposed to be a democracy, we have the right and the obligation to
demand a change of course when we perceive it to be necessary.
We must advocate an immediate end to this bloody, futile occupation and a
path that will right the decades of wrongs we have wrought upon the people
of Iraq. To achieve such an end and begin such a path, US military forces
must immediately withdraw from Iraq and the US government must completely
transfer authority over Iraq to the United Nations, which will supervise
the allocation of reconstruction funds and Iraqi oil revenues, send in an
international peace keeping force comprised in large part of other Arab
nations, give Iraq genuine sovereignty--rather than the phony
"sovereignty" the US recently handed its puppet interim government--and
allow Iraq to hold elections and become truly independent as soon as possible.
And we must also send some broader messages to the Establishment: you will
not attempt to force the people of Iraq or any other nation to submit
before the Golden Calf of American power. You will not raise upon them your
terrible sword--forged in the fire of exploding bombs and burning
buildings, made of the metal of industry and bullets and coated with the
gold of corporate wealth. And you will not sacrifice them upon an alter
cynically draped with the American flag.