The Columbus Institute of Contemporary Journalism (CICJ) has operated Freepress.org since 2000 and ColumbusFreepress.com was started initially as a separate project to highlight the print newspaper and local content.
ColumbusFreepress.com has been operating as a project of the CICJ for many years and so the sites are now being merged so all content on ColumbusFreepress.com now lives on Freepress.org
The Columbus Freepress is a non-profit funded by donations we need your support to help keep local journalism that isn't afraid to speak truth to power alive.
But we're taking their oil. And not just to finance reconstruction.
Paul Bremer, the U.S. administrator of the Iraqi occupation, made that
clear back in July when he declared that Iraq needs to accept foreign
investment and privatization of its oil before a permanent government
is put in charge of the country. In other words, democracy is welcome
only after the most important economic decisions for the future of
Iraqis have been decided for them.
You’d think that such a blatant rejection of democracy and obvious grab
at Iraq’s oil would attract more notice. Bremer made it clear that
corporations have priority over people in Iraq, and that the U.S.
occupation plans to ensure that.
Our occupation of Iraq has an eerie similarity to another intervention
in the Middle East that occurred 50 years ago--the CIA-British coup
that ousted Iran’s democratically elected leader, Mohammed Mossadegh
and installed the infamous Shah of Iran.
So when Arab nations greet our rhetoric of creating democracy with
suspicion or outright derision, we’ve earned it. Iranians struggled
successfully for democracy and we promptly crushed their dream.
Then as now, the US and Great Britain used violence to prevent Iraq and
Iran from controlling their own oil.
This set of priorities contrasts sharply to the US occupation of Japan
after WWII, when Americans sat down with Japanese scholars and
collaboratively designed and implemented one of the most progressive
democratic constitutions in the world. We can take pride for having
helped Japan evolve into a peaceful, stable, and prosperous country
that is one of our closest allies. Today, Iranian and Iraqi people
resent our support of their previous corrupt regimes and,
understandably, don’t trust our intentions now.
The differences between American occupations of 1945 Japan and 2003
Iraq reflect the rise of corporate power here and abroad, and within
the Bush Administration in particular. Dick Cheney’s former company,
Halliburton, is already cashing in on Iraqi “rebuilding” contracts that
it obtained from the US government. The oil companies that donated so
heavily to the Bush campaign will reap huge profits if they are allowed
to take over oil production in Iraq. The weapons makers profit from
Bush’s policies as well, and even telecommunications companies stand to
benefit, since Bremer intends to give foreign corporations license to
operate mobile phone networks in Iraq.
It’s no surprise that Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, and Donald Rumsfeld
have been advocating an invasion of Iraq since at least 1998 through
the Project for a New American Century. It could be argued that Saddam
Hussein has been a marked man since he nationalized Iraqi oil back in
1973, but that’s another story.
Meanwhile, the American occupation of Iraq increasingly resembles the
cycle of violence between Palestinians and Israelis: American soldiers
are ambushed and killed, and the US military retaliates by rounding up
and imprisoning Iraqi “suspects,” including civilians, women, and
children as young as 11. More Iraqi violence results, and the cycle
continues. Iraqis have little hope that American troops will withdraw
anytime soon and have not been treated with dignity or human rights by
their occupiers.
How did the American ideals of liberty and justice become hollow
slogans for presidents to use to justify military attacks abroad? Ever
since Eisenhower warned us of the dangers of the military-industrial
complex, it has become steadily more powerful. Corporations should not
be allowed to influence foreign policy.
Yet the Bush Administration’s foreign policy, like domestic policy,
often seems to come directly from corporate boardrooms. For example,
Executive Order 13303 grants complete legal immunity to transnational
oil companies operating in Iraq. While US soldiers attempt to
establish law and order in Iraq, Bush has put oil companies above the
law.
The time to end the occupation of Iraq is overdue. We should pull our
troops out before more of them die, hand the temporary administration
of Iraq over to the UN, let the UN weapons inspectors back in Iraq,
fund the rebuilding of Iraq through the UN, and allow Iraqis to choose
their own government.
The best way for us to fight terrorism is to advance justice; and
justice will not be possible as long as corporations are prioritized
over people.
Devin Nordberg writes for ReclaimDemocracy.org, an organization devoted
to restoring citizen authority over corporations and advancing
democracy.